FAQ

(Actually, this should probably be an OAC – Occasionally Asked Questions)

 

Q:  Are you a professional photographer?

A:  Uh, no.  Actually, my day job is as a software design engineer for embedded systems.  I am a climber myself and enjoy photography as a serious hobby.

 

Q:  So who do you take these pictures for?

A:  For fun, for practice, USA Climbing and mostly, for you.  USA Climbing sometimes uses my shots for their literature, the season poster, or their web site.  Sometimes, one of the climbing magazines will run one of the shots taken at the national competition.  Sorry; my photos won’t make you famous – only you can do that!  If my shots can help you somehow, though, I’m all for that.

 

Q:  Why do you sometimes just give away free prints?

A:  For a few reasons.  The main one is that the photos do no one any good by sitting in a box in a closet somewhere.  If I charged for the photos, then it wouldn’t be a hobby anymore – and what would be the fun of that?  Besides, the climbers I photograph are excellent.  They have put a lot of work into what they do – that’s worth at least a few photographs!

 

Q:  I have one of the prints that you gave me – how can I get another copy?

A:  One way is by finding the photograph on my web site and ordering the print through the Kodak Gallery.  There are an awful lot of photos on my web site, so I know that it can take a while to find just the print you are looking for.  If you don’t know which competition the shot is from, I always write the date of the competition on its back, so that should help narrow it down.  If you don’t have the time to search through hundreds of photos from a competition (and who does?) you can email me (see the Contact button above) with the exposure number (it looks like:  109.172.130) that I wrote on the back of your print and I will email you the original digital file so that you can print the photo however you like.  Even a very old film photo will still have a date and exposure number written on its back if it came from me.  If there is no exposure number written on its back, don’t despair – if you can describe the shot to me, I can still likely find it for you.  I never throw negatives or files away.

 

Q:  You used to mail out photos to all participants at Nationals – do you still do that?

A:  Alas, no.  I used to take no more than 1800 film photos at Nationals.  I had to print all of them to see which ones were best for possible publication.  Since they were printed anyway, I could either trash all of them when I was done, or send the prints to the climbers.  It seemed far more fun to send them to the climbers.  Now that I use digital cameras, I take many more shots and I don’t have to print them to see which are best.  On top of that, preparing a good digital photo takes more of my time.  For instance, the photo lab would balance the color and exposure for film shots – but for digital shots, I must balance the color and exposure myself.  Also, to look its best, each digital shot must be rotated and cropped.  This all takes time and I am not a photographer by trade; most of the time, I’m playing software engineer to pay the bills.  I stopped mailing out Nationals photos when I found that I couldn’t prepare all of the 2005 Nationals shots before the 2006 Nationals.  It’s a bummer, but there it is.

 

Q:  Can I get the original digital files from you?

A:  Yes.  If you want less than about six files, I’ll email them to you.  If you’d like more than that, I’ll prepare a CD or DVD with all of your digital shots for $10.  Just contact me using the information from the “Contact” link above.

 

Q:  What exactly comes on that CD or DVD?

A:  Both the original files from the camera and the full-sized retouched files that I made the prints from.  You tell me which climbers and competitions you want the files from and I’ll get them to you (depending on how many climbers – for instance, Team Texas might require more than one CD or DVD).  The photos are JPEG files and generally 6 to 12 megapixel (depending on how they are cropped).  You can use these files to make as many copies for friends and relatives, make enlargements, put them on your web site, etc.  They are your photos.

 

Q:  Can I use your photos for publication?

A:  The short answer:  yes.  I charge no royalties for photos, so if the photo is of you, or you can get an OK from the pictured climber, you are free to use it for publication.  I do appreciate hearing about any of my photos that are being published, and if possible, I would appreciate being given credit for the photo in the publication.

 

Q:  Some folks get lots of pictures while others don’t get many – do you play favorites?

A:  The short answer:  yes.  My goal is to get good shots of as many of the climbers as I can.  Still, some climbers have climbing styles that are conducive to great shots, while others, even the best of climbers, have styles that make photography nearly impossible.  For instance:  at redpoint competitions, climbers who try a lot of climbs and choose well-lit climbs get more shots.  I believe that a good shot shows a climber’s face, so climbers who look at their feet most of the time will get very few photographs while climbers who default to looking up at the route ahead will get more.  Some climbers have a very unrushed style while others are in constant motion, but motion ruins photos in a dark gym.  When several climbers are climbing at once, I focus on the one who is working the most photogenic portion of the climb.  If more than one climber are working photogenic cruxes, I admit, I focus on the Pacific Northwest climber – or if not, I focus on the climber that I’ve gotten great shots with in the past.

 

Q:  So do you use a digital camera?

A:  Yes.  I’ve been all-digital since 2005.  I currently use two Nikon D700 cameras.  The D700 does really well in the low light conditions of climbing gyms.  I use an 80-200mm f2.8 zoom on one camera and a 24-70mm f2.8 zoom on the other.  I used to take pictures with film cameras, but now they are serving as doorstops and paperweights. :)  Ah, technology!

 

Q:  I usually see you with two cameras – why is that?

I almost always use two cameras these days because it is very hard to build an f2.8 zoom lens with a very large range.  If I could buy an f2.8 (or better!) lens with a zoom range of 17-150mm (APS sensor) or 24-200mm (full size sensor), I’d get it.  Until such a thing is available, the only way to get that kind of range is to use two lenses.  Since I can’t swap lenses fast enough (and they might fall to their doom if I tried!) that means two cameras.  I currently own a 24-120mm f3.5-5.6 lens and use that and just one camera (a Nikon D80) outside where light is plentiful.  For indoor photography, though, it’s hard to beat an f2.8.  The boost in picture quality is enough that it’s worth juggling two cameras.

 

Q:  You always seem to use a lens hood on your lenses – why bother?

The lens hood just blocks light from the side that shouldn’t be in the picture and prevents it from hitting the lens.  When a strong light source (like the sun or, say, a gym light) strikes the lens but isn’t directly in the picture, it still affects the picture.  This is because no lens is perfect – especially in a climbing gym where dust is constantly accumulating on the lens.  Light hits these imperfections and is scattered back toward the film (or digital sensor) adding light to the picture that shouldn’t be there.  This scattered light decreases the contrast and sharpness of the picture.  It can be very noticeable – especially if you have a shot with and without a lens hood to compare.  Sometimes you may see me with my hand out in front of the lens to shade it.  This is because the lens hood on a zoom lens must be cut for its widest angle or the hood will end up being in the picture.  This means that the hood cannot be sufficient to completely protect the lens at the larger magnifications (narrower angles).  I sometimes need to compensate for this by shading it with my hand.

 

Q:  How come you never use a flash?  Your pictures would be less grainy, yes?

Yes.  I don’t use a flash mostly because I like to put my lens as much in the faces of the climbers as I can – and I’d prefer not to risk having a climber not do their best because they were distracted by a flash.  There are other reasons too, though.  I like the look of pictures taken with available light – that is, light that comes from several different sources and not just from the camera all the time – that would be boring!  Also, there is a lot of chalk dust floating in the gym.  This dust ruins flash shots by adding big fluffy white blobs to the picture.  The farther away the subject is, the more dust, and the worse the shot looks.

 

Q:  My photos always turn out dark or blurry.  How do you get these shots?

A:  I used to use fast film (ASA 1600), but a good digital camera is able to simulate fast film with a menu setting.  On the D80 and D700, there is even an “ISO” button for setting the simulated film speed and while I’m shooting in a gym, I generally set this to ASA 1600, just like the film I used to use.  This is because although the camera allows a faster setting, ASA 1600 is as fast as the D700 will go and still look acceptable, in my opinion.  Some gyms have enough light (usually only on sunny days through skylights) that I can use ASA 800 – which I will use (on the D80) when I can because the quality is noticeably better.  The D700, due to its larger sensor, is better in low light than the D80.  The D700 is better at ASA 1600 than the D80 is at ASA 800.

 

Every digital camera is different.  Some don’t allow the ISO or ASA speed to be set and some require difficult menu gyrations to change the speed.  Also, a smaller camera generally has a smaller sensor which is more susceptible to noise in dark conditions than a larger sensor.  Although ASA 1600 works fine on my camera, you may find that a higher (faster) number works fine on yours, or perhaps that you will have to use a lower number to keep the picture from looking too grainy.

 

If you want to try using a flash, go ahead!  Just because I don’t use a flash doesn’t mean that you must not use one.  I’ve never heard a climber complain that a flash used from the ground was distracting.  When I ask them, they usually say something like, “you took a picture?  Cool.”

 

Caveats:

  • If you use fast film, make sure the flash on your camera is disabled.  Often, the wall is too far away for the flash to work and if your camera thinks it can use the flash, it will try and fail and your photo will be dark.

 

  • When using a “fast film” setting instead of the flash, the darker the gym, the longer your camera’s shutter will have to stay open to get the shot.  Any movement while the shutter is open will cause the picture to streak and blur.  The more motionless you can hold the camera, the better your shot will be.  Also, try to catch the climber at a pause between moves.  In a dark gym, the climber’s movement will also streak and blur the picture.

 

  • When using a flash, you may end up with big soft white spots like dandelion fluff in your picture.  If you see these big spots, there is nothing wrong with your camera; it’s a hazard of climbing gym flash photography.  The spots are due to the huge amounts of very white chalk dust floating in the air.  When a flash hits them, they light up like miniature beacons.  This is another reason I don’t use a flash during competitions.

 

  • If you use flash, two things can easily go wrong: 1) if the flash hits something (like the back of someone’s head) before it gets to the climber, it will see too much light, and shut down.  You will have a fine blurry shot of the back of someone’s head, but the climber will be too dark.  2) Your flash may not be powerful enough to reach the wall.  Again, your picture will be too dark.  It’s best to take a shot and then look at it to see how it turned out so that you will know whether to shut off the flash and use a higher ISO/ASA setting, or move closer to the wall or away from obstructions.

 

Good luck!